Ask your students to consider how reliable the "free" health advice
on the World Wide Web is. Direct each student to select a disease
or mental disorder with which they have some familiarity or interest.
(You could use the example of Internet Addiction Disorder in class
and pull on the results offered in chapter five.)
Each student should identify at least five sites from the World Wide
Web dealing with a given topic. Encourage them to select a variety
of sites: some combination of personal homepages, those sponsored
by non-profit organizations, commercial sites from pharmaceutical
companies, hospitals, or practitioners, sites for support groups,
etc.
Have the students compare the information about the disorder on each
of these sites. What information was held in common and what was novel?
What criteria would you use to determine which information to accept
and which to reject?
Typically, many students will not find major discrepancies in the
diagnoses as they compare sites; however, a number of students will
have found subtle if not stark contradictions in some instances. (Quackwatch
could help you identify one reserve example to make the point if necessary.)
Ask students to adopt an empathetic stance and consider how vulnerable
someone suffering this disorder could be to misleading advice. Just
because a lot of health-related information may be correct, does that
mean all of it is legitimate?